Bethesda just keeps getting away with releasing broken games and the let the fans do the fixing.

[OdinHades]

BraLoD said:

That's the difference between being a professional critic and a fan.

I can perferctly understand someone telling me Fallout 4 is amazing, that's the GOTG to them, that it was an amazing experience or things like that, what I don't want to see are professional critics doing it while not doing their job as it should have been done. Sure, they can love it as well, but how can they score it a 9.5 for example, which is basically perfect, considering one of the most wide scoring ranges were scores have 20 layers (a XX/20) it's a 19/20, so they are telling me that despite the game lacking innovations from previous games, a graphical quality that don't feel evolved from last generation games of them or on par with what the system can provide and with a big history of several bugs coming from games that like from a decade without them fix it, they are even infamous because of that already, that's only missing a point? And that is without even going through the gameplay, story, story telling, music, etc. When several other games having just one of those issues miss more points than that? It could pass if it was a pattern with most games, but it definitely is not, several games don't have this easy of a time when they have any kind of this issues.

Don't want to take anything away from Fallout, just that some reviewers are not weighting this on a fair ground compared to what happen to other games.

The whole is more than the sum of its parts.