By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Zekkyou said:
Azzanation said:
While PC runs the game at 60 frames. These machines got old very quickly, we still get games render under 30 frames isn't what I call next gen experience.

It seems a little unfair to blame the consoles themselves for these issues when there are several titles on both systems that look and perform much better. This is an optimization issue, not strictly a hardware one.

OT: So better on the PS4, but overall not amazing on either. It doesn't look as bad as some were trying to argue a couple of weeks ago (it's a pretty obvious upgrade over the last installment), but it's hard not to be a little disappointed. Not wanting to push the technical envelope is fine, but you should at least be hitting your performance target if you opt to go down that direction.

My biggest gripe is the fact Fallout 4 runs better on a budget PC. Optimising is very important and all companies should be doing that all the time, and if all companies do that we would barely tell the differences between the PS4 and XB1. However that doesnt change the fact that a budget PC runs FO4 better then the PS4/XB1 when i remember them saying these consoles were considered super computers in Japan.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iipDWbd6HNg

And many articles claiming this below

http://www.dualshockers.com/2013/10/26/the-ps4-is-a-supercomputer-according-to-japanese-regulations-xbox-one-is-just-under-the-threshold/