By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Machiavellian on 02 November 2015
Edit Thread
jlmurph2 said:
John2290 said:

Thats painfully short. The Order gets ripped apart for this same fact but Halo gets away with it. I bought every Halo game up until the one in south Africa so I can safely say every one of them post Combat evolved gets progressivly worse, this seems to follow that trend. I suspect paid reviewsor some ridiculous embargo rules designed to get a higher score from the reviewer.

  
The simple fact that you're addressing it shows that Halo isn't getting away with it. Main thing is that Halo offers much more than The Order does. I beat the game on legendary with 3 friends in about 10 hours. The other 24 hours I have spent in the game has been multiplayer. With free DLC on the way. Much better $60 than 1886.

Totally agree.  The the big difference between Halo and The Order is that the Order only had a singleplayer.  Once you finished it you really had no reason to ever come back to that game.  Halo has single, co-op and multiplayer and a map creator.  The Wealth of options you have in a Halo game is huge.  Also even if you were just a singleplayer person you can play solo and co-op playing the different difficulty and even adding the skull for added varity.  So grading The Order against Halo, get that junk out of here since tyey are definitely in the same category.