By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
archer9234 on 31 October 2015
Edit Thread
ClassicGamingWizzz said:
archer9234 said:
LurkerJ said:

Why is having sex with a 15 year old perceived as horrible (and 16 isn't)? Isn't it just sex? Is sex harmful? Who are we trying to protect and from what?

Genuine questions.

I'd like to point out that I don't have any fantasies that involve "minors" but I like what I am reading here and I would appreciate the input of some of you. 

It's usually because morality is in play. My stance is: If the character is fictional. Being game, CGI, drawing, animation. And it involves lolicon. I'd accept it. To me it's just another thing someone wants to fap to. Let's be honest here. Anything in your room, as you read this. Someone will fap to it. No matter how dumb you think this statment is.

There is someone out there fapping to a keyboard. Lolicon is not real. It's a fantasy. Would you hate a person who is happly married for 50 years, has children. But has a room of lolicon? Did said person do ANYTHING social wrong? No. You can mark said person as weird/perverted. But not a pedophile. Since no real action of it, or abuse, has ever taken place. Because if you want to start covering this up. You have to contiune your stance to other areas. Take this photo.

 


But those photos are from a catalogue that have a purporse, show the stuff for the parents to buy cloths to children, its not made with the purporse of some sick fuck to fap to it but the character that is in the OP ( not in the OP in the other thread ) is made for what ?

I would love to know why the hell people likes shit like this or anime characters underaged in sexy poses and almost with no clothing like we saw a ton in this site in signs etc.

"Purpose" what does that even mean? The point I was making was young girls already dress pratically as adult women do now. Even boys. Since pants don't change. Everything is virtually the same. Except their outfits are cloth based VS. something more smooth/stretchy. It's still the same thing. And if you are someone that censors games like this. You have to also go after these companies too.

If those outfits, in that photo, are fine. Then I assume no one here will say XCX's character is dressing badly than? And also lobby America's Top Model to be rated TVMA. Because children shouldn't be seeing those outfits. Because they are being influenced. This is were the stupid in the rating system starts to show up. The point of ratings is to protect kids from seeing things that scare or infulence them in a bad way. At the wrong age. This is considerd bad, so....

"But those photos are from a catalogue that have a purporse, show the stuff for the parents to buy cloths to children, its not made with the purporse of some sick fuck to fap to it" You think that matters? I already said someone out their will fap to anything. Regardless on your view towards it. Same can be said here. In Japan, it's legal. So where do you draw the line. It's "fine" in some place, in the world. It's the same confusing issue when people ask why do you have a foot fetish. You do realize the "normal" attractive breasts, legs, and butts, are body parts too. And are no different than a foot, or something else. So why are people confused? This is a oxymoron.

Here's a bigger question. Would this all be fine. If all the young boys had a swiming pants option too. Like Shulk does in SSB4.