Would you censor fictional sexual content that depict minors?

[HollyGamer]

ClassicGamingWizzz said:

archer9234 said:

LurkerJ said:

Why is having sex with a 15 year old perceived as horrible (and 16 isn't)? Isn't it just sex? Is sex harmful? Who are we trying to protect and from what?

Genuine questions.

I'd like to point out that I don't have any fantasies that involve "minors" but I like what I am reading here and I would appreciate the input of some of you. 

It's usually because morality is in play. My stance is: If the character is fictional. Being game, CGI, drawing, animation. And it involves lolicon. I'd accept it. To me it's just another thing someone wants to fap to. Let's be honest here. Anything in your room, as you read this. Someone will fap to it. No matter how dumb you think this statment is.

There is someone out there fapping to a keyboard. Lolicon is not real. It's a fantasy. Would you hate a person who is happly married for 50 years, has children. But has a room of lolicon? Did said person do ANYTHING social wrong? No. You can mark said person as weird/perverted. But not a pedophile. Since no real action of it, or abuse, has ever taken place. Because if you want to start covering this up. You have to contiune your stance to other areas. Take this photo.

 

But those photos are from a catalogue that have a purporse, show the stuff for the parents to buy cloths to children, its not made with the purporse of some sick fuck to fap to it but the character that is in the OP is made for what ?

I would love to know why the hell people likes shit like this or anime characters underaged in sexy poses and almost with no clothing like we saw a ton in this site in signs etc.

So i say good work nintendo.