By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
archer9234 on 30 October 2015
Edit Thread
97alexk said:
archer9234 said:
97alexk said:
archer9234 said:
97alexk said:
Goodnightmoon said:

In the moment when to cover a little bit of a 13 year old girl body is called "censorship" and a reason for backlash, you know there is something really fucked up with gaming comunity.

THIS so much this. It feels like people have gotten so anti-censorship its going tooo far in the other direction.

Well. You do dumb decisons in other areas. The dumbness starts to spread.

thats not how it works

Yeah it does. Companies keep doing stupid things like the censorship in the M rated fatal frame. Which is dumb. Eventually, the people hating the censorship, will now hate all forms of alterations in a game, owned by Nintendo, weather it's reasonable or not.

hating on this censorship is preatty stupid.and saying ''reasonable or not'' doesnt make your case stronger

Why is hating on censorship pretty stupid? It can be negative or positive. It's valid critisim. I belive this change is valid. But could of been handled better. During the design phase of the game. And not allow it to begin with. A bikini isn't confusing why it was blocked. Over say in Pokemon BW. Gym leader Lenora's appearance.

At the end of the day. This game is being released world wide. It's a waste, to waste your time censoring it, at this stage. VS shooting it down at the build stage of the game. Were no one would even have known. The most money ends up being foreign sales, anyway.  Fatal Frame is an example of it being implimented stupidly. Same goes for Saints Row IV release in Austrialia. It's stupid for the facts of them being M rated games. Were things that can be offensive and not apporite should be allowed. Because of the age the audiance it's going for. VS this game. That is gonna be aiming for a Teen rating. If this was left it. It would of msot likley forced the game to be M rated.