GribbleGrunger said:
It really is and was that simple. Why are people wanting to change it? Amazon has been wrong once, people on here knew it and people on Gaf knew it but now all of a sudden Amazon was never wrong because of 'a', 'b' and 'c'. We're now changing the goalposts and have taken the fun out of this thread. It's now nothing more than constant speculation without a defining result because no result is defining, just a reason to find out how to make Amazon look right when it was wrong. It was always simple and therefore 'fun': Whoever was at the top of the monthlies was Amazon's prediction of who won the month. It's been wrong once so far (well it used to be wrong once but now we can make it right). |
Looks like you're sucking the "fun" out of it with your ranting over something so trivial. To me it stupid to declare the winner on who is on top and doesn't make sense in the real world. Like I said in the past it was much more simple with only a few bundles about (most of the time just one bundle vrs one bundle) but when you have over 10 bundles in the top 100 at some points, it doesn't make sense to discount the sales of the other 8 or so bundles and look at the top 2.
