By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
radha said:


you are forgetting the context in which this is happening, the guys that perpetrated the colombine masacre were 17 and 18, that means one of them was a kid, people in the US are getting paraniod about any type of crisis going on in a school, the girl here should have done what the officer told her, schools are becoming like airports in US, anything can scalate quickly since there are other inocent children around, so no one is accepting any tipe of rebelilous behaviour. Note that I think that the officer could have manage the situation better, but the girl is not a victim, she created a situation in wich the teacher was scare enough to call the police, and the policeman went to a school, bad combination to start not doing what you are told.

So because there have been cases where "kids" have done some horrible things that justifies these actions? Am I saying the girl was in the right....not at all....BUT this situation was handled VERY poorly. No way that was called for in any form to get a misbehaving student out of the class room. I have seen fights broken up in high school with less force. So to first put the arm around her neck(chokehold style), then flip her over IN THE DESK then snatch her out of the desk and fling her across the room like a rag doll is unacceptable for an office of the law. This may have been necessary in other instances but not in this one...not at all. 



The absence of evidence is NOT the evidence of absence...

PSN: StlUzumaki23