Zelda: Tri Force Heroes first reviews [Metacritic: 75]

[DivinePaladin]

Goodnightmoon said:

DivinePaladin said:

I can tell you're a Zelda fan by the fact that you're complaining about the newest game in the series. 

 

Whether YOU wanted it or not, I've seen requests for years by the Four Swords series' fans for a third multiplayer game. Nobody really asked for it to be one or three players only (seriously, a two player option would have been nice), but let's not let your clear bias affect people who might like the game. I'm sure it's about as enjoyable as FS/FSA, which means very for some and not at all for others. So, the same as pretty much every Zelda game!

There is something similar, you can actually play with only one friend, and then the third one is an online stranger.

Also is nie the fact that one or two friends can play without having the game, and everything except the colosseum (that is not a big deal) is unlocked to play, so finding 1 or 2 friends with a 3ds to play is not very hard, certainly not as hard as finding 4 friends with a GBA to play in your GC to Four Swords. And I actually had a great time playing alone with random users, sometimes it can be a pain in the ass (some people is pretty bad) but overall it was fun.

Yeah, download play is a wonderful addition (that they really haven't advertised enough for this game because $$$). However, I still wish there'd be an option for all styles of play. I don't care if it would cause some problems occasionally, I'd love to play locally with my roommate and share the third puppet, especially since our third player is an hour away and doesn't like Zelda enough by itself to buy it right away. That makes things sort of a pain without much reason behind it.