By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DivinePaladin said:
Pavolink said:
mZuzek said:
bunchanumbers said:
I doubt it will break into the 80s for meta. Captain Toad was a great game and that hit a meta of 81. I'm surprised at the outlier reviews though. I doubt it deserves a 5. It will most likely deserves more than that.

That's coming from the guys who gave Tropical Freeze a 6 out of 10. You shouldn't expect any better from them.

Or that made ALBW their GOTY 2013.

 

Face it: this is a big waste of time that nobody asked for and reviews are confirming.

I can tell you're a Zelda fan by the fact that you're complaining about the newest game in the series. 

 

Whether YOU wanted it or not, I've seen requests for years by the Four Swords series' fans for a third multiplayer game. Nobody really asked for it to be one or three players only (seriously, a two player option would have been nice), but let's not let your clear bias affect people who might like the game. I'm sure it's about as enjoyable as FS/FSA, which means very for some and not at all for others. So, the same as pretty much every Zelda game!

There is something similar, you can actually play with only one friend, and then the third one is an online stranger.

Also is nice the fact that one or two friends can play with you without having the game, and everything except the colosseum (that is not a big deal) is unlocked to play, so finding 1 or 2 friends with a 3ds to play the whole game is not very hard, certainly not as hard as finding 4 friends with a GBA to play in your GC to Four Swords. And I actually had a great time playing alone with random users, sometimes it can be a pain in the ass (some people is pretty bad) but overall it was fun.