| SpokenTruth said: Apple never had a physical content product to begin with. And again, you're focusing on the periphery of the patent rather than the patent. Want me to show you all the Wii patents that still showed a GC as part of the set up? Or all the Wii U patents that still showed a GC (yep, GC) as part of the set up? And so much more. They (and all companies) do this in their patents. I keep telling you this and you keep ignoring it. Go read some patents and learn how they are prepared and published. |
Doesn't matter. Music was a physical content industry until Apple said it wasn't. If Sony did it first and as well, it would have been the same situation.
That's absolutely not the same thing as deliberately patenting a diskless console. It's not using the existing lack of a disk as an example to prove a greater point. The GCN was being used because it already existed for Nintendo and was an easy visual to understand. This patent is literally saying, "this is for a peice of hardware that is deliberately and intentionally lacking a disk drive." U]Learn to understand the difference.
