By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
noname2200 said:
mornelithe said:

You didn't seriously just suggest that a penalty that would've resulted in the Lions regaining possession at half the distance to the goal (from the spot of the foul), would've been meaningless to the outcome of a 10-13 game, did you?

Try again.

"We'll review all the angles," Blandino said on Monday Night Football. "On TV it looked like the Seahawks player intentionally hit the ball. That is a foul. The result of the penalty would give Detroit possession enforced at the spot of the fumble. With half the distance to the goal line, Detroit would have had a first down."

Is that clear enough for you?