Rather than replying to individual people here I'll just leave this here instead.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayStation_Network#Instant_Game_Collection
Taking note of " In 2014, PlayStation Plus provided more than $1,300 worth of games in the Instant Game Collection"
It doesn't really matter if you personally think that certain games being offered from the service aren't AAA enough, what matters is that with a functional budget of $50 over 3 systems you're getting access to over 20x (26 to be exact) that amount of games in sheer dollar value.
The people who are asking for major retail AAA titles to come to the service because they didn't buy them yet... keep in mind that most really popular good games... well most people have gone out and bought them, so it would take a lot of money effort from Sony to secure such a game because of it's high profile. Not to mention those people who actually have more than pocket money to spend on gaming would have already bought the main AAA games so they would be being punished overall by being offered up something that the majority of gamers bought.
The way to look at psn+ is that it's $/€50 a year and you'll get some games you didn't/might not have bought before, if they targeted games everyone did buy then each month complaints would be there that people would already own the games and it would introduce a situation where people don't buy new games because they wait for them to appear on the service much like many people @ steam do not consider buying new games at full price and simply wait for them to be cut massively in sales before handing over cash, that's bad for business so publishers would have no interest in doing it.
Or at the end of the day if there is one particular AAA game you guys wanted... use the psn+ sub money you have to buy that instead and forego the $1250 of other games over the next 12 months for it, tis an easy choice in my mind.
Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive
