walsufnir said:
DerNebel said:
It is kinda funny how this is even a discussion though, I remember when the TR deal was announced that it was treated like a huge get for MS and later on when SFV was revealed I saw it being downplayed as totally irrelevant, while TR would be huge on Xbox. A lot of that TR will be huge talk kinda disappeared with the actual reveal of the versions on the other platforms though... It might be that I saw all of that on reddit and not here, I'm not sure. |
Semantics. Downplaying, "upplaying", just making sure your favorite company looks the best in any case. MS bought it because of UC4, of course, to counter it in some way, at least. Also it is subjective to read that only one side is doing it while ignoring the other. I guess everyone is guilty of that, in some way, though.
|
Sure everyone is guilty, all I'm saying is that this Tomb Raider thing is a fun thing to follow from the sidelines, a lot of flipflopping on both sides between not caring for the game and caring after all etc.
Btw. now that I think about it, I do think most of what I remember has been concentrated to reddit, those guys went totally nuts over TR before all the details of the deal were announced, can't remember how often I read "Spencer said he wouldn't fund a game that would come to another platform" over there.
