Samus Aran said:
Goodnightmoon said:
Samus Aran said:
Normchacho said:
Why is it a bad game? I've never played it, but most impressions I get from people say that it's fun. Not great, but fun.
You confuse your opinion of a game with it's objective quality a lot...
|
It's bland, charmless, ugly looking and locks most content away behind expensive toys. Look at the userscores (on the Wii U eshop for example). It's mostly just little kids that like it, they like anything, even if it's crap.
|
It isn´t bad Samus, the game is super complete, it works fine and it has a ton of variety, the heavy locked content is bad, but in this game, as in skylanders and Lego Dimension, you can play all the entire campaign with the toys that come with the started pack, you dont need all the toys at all.
I have never been interested in this kind of game, I played Skylanders a few times because my little brother had the game on Wii and it wasnt nearly as bad a people make it to be. You can say is overrated in meta (specially when a wonderfull and truly charming game like Yoshi´s Woolly World is behind it), but not really bad.
And btw, Lego Dimension is looking amazing, that´s the first toys to life game that I´m been interested in since forever.
|
If Disney's next big animated movie had the quality of Disney Infinity, how wou:lùd critics rate it? Gaming critics get impressed by everything and have little standard.
"Wow, it works, that's at least a 7/10!"
|
Don´t compare movies to games because there is no point. It works mean is not broken in any sense, not only bugs or performance issues but mechanics too, there are a bunch of AAA high scored games with broken mechanics (Shadows of Mordor fight mechanics ehem ehem, God that game was shit...) that make the games not fun for anyone that can see above pretty graphics and boring cinematics with stupid and pretentious stories (something that critics love), so in this industry a game that "works" it´s actually something lol
