Zekkyou said:
Goodnightmoon said:
The quality of a game is not define by graphics, you know? I don´t pay for graphics, to say that a game is money grab because it doesn´t have top notch graphics is just stupid, Super Mario Maker and Splatoon are fantastic without any fancy graphics, in fact I think Star Fox Zero is more demanding than those games, are thouse money grab games? My ass. Some people in the industry still thinks that the 80% of the budget of game shouldn´t be only for graphics, as it happens nowadays with most of the games, but gamers are sometimes like the stupidest people in this planet and their priorities are fucking lame.
This game hasn´t had a chance to show its quality at all, everybody has already buried it because it doesn´t look impressive graphic-wise, because this graphics are completely horrible and unplayable:
[image]
Totally umplayable graphics from Atari 2600, how can anybody be interested on a game that look like that! Only fanboys! This is how repelent and disgusting gamers are nowadays, they overhype or ignore games just because how they look, pure superficial manistream shit, "gamers" they call themself.... yeah...
|
I don't think I've ever seen anyone refer to Star Fox as 'unplayable' because of the graphics.
Anyway, could you try and tone down the bolded part a bit? Regardless to how you feel about the topic, there's really no need for sweeping 'look at all these people i'm better than' style insults. By all means express your dissatifaction, but "repellent and disgusting"? Nope.
|
Nobody is dissing the gameplay, some people were angry because of the whole tilting the GamePad to aim but that thing died the day when Nintendo revealed that players can turn that off.
But the bad graphics are just inexcusable for a AAA game. We are not talking about art style, this game has shitty graphics from a technical point of view.
2015 and we have a game with Gamecube textures.
