Goodnightmoon said:
midrange said:
Splatoon's graphics were never bad. People thought it was a rushed game due to quantity of content. And upon release that was still a valid complaint.
Star fox u on the other hand looks nowhere near splatoon. People who compare the game to gamecube level graphics are obviously off. That being said, star fox u looking like a 2008 game in 2015 is a huge dissappointment with regards to graphics. There have been many past games to reach 60 fps without having to compromise graphics, and even if they did compromise graphics, it wouldn't be by an entire generation! Unless of course they wanted to make the game in a short time frame.
Again, graphics don't make or break a game. Neither does story or characters or artstyle. But they do affect the game's immersion. In this case, Nintendo seems to be killing star fox's graphics for gamepad motion control (optional and in many eyes, a gimmick). This also doesn't entitle Miyamoto to say "every other game looks the same, star fox's graphics are meant to look unique"
|
Miyamoto didn´t say "every other game looks the same", He said A LOT of games looks the same, and is totally true, there are a ton of realistic games that look the same, but of course there are some others that look realist and unique at the same time.
|
If he was gonna make such a bold accusation about realistic games (whether it's for alot, most, or all realistic games), than I would at least want him to echo what you said "there are some others that look realistic and unique at the same time." However he didn't, and it's really sad given his influence in the gaming world to see him make a bold generalization. Especially if it's to solely to promote his game.
