BraLoD said:
Samus Aran said:
BraLoD said:
fatslob-:O said:
We all have opinions ...
I think I can compare it to COD when it comes to milking the idea and that's exactly what From Software is doing ...
|
I don't think it's even remotely close.
Call of Duty resells the same stuff to you, and has been doing it for a decade every year.
From Software is still to have any of the souls games in a following year to their predecessor.
Demon's Souls - 2009
Dark Souls - 2011
Dark Souls 2 - 2014
Dark Souls 3 - 2016
While Bloodborne is a different IP, even as it's taken as one of the Souls games, but has different gameplay and mechanics and is set in a different era.
|
Barely and just like CoD.
|
Barely? Yeah... no.
In Bloodborne weapons are few and change sizes and adapt other gameplay functionalities you have guns, you are faster and not affected by weight, enemies provide you a chance to recover life when taken away. Demon's Souls had events that would interfere in the game difficult and some weapons actual power and your life status.
Bloodborne is really a different game than the Souls games, even as Demon's Souls is also different to Dark Souls, those too is understandable to group, but Bloodborne is not.
And as I said, CoD is yearly and has been for a decade, none of the Souls or Bloodborne IPs have gotten another main game in a year base.
Two totally different scenarios.
|
Add to that:
- Bloodborne is a huge massive homage to H.PLovecraft
- Neither of the games milk dlc and season passes like COD
- the level design of not genius is borderline genius. The same can never be said about any COD or in that matter any FPS. It's Inception level badass.
