By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
generic-user-1 on 09 September 2015
Edit Thread
TheWPCTraveler said:
TruckOSaurus said:

ISIS isn't the most cooperative organization when it comes to peace talks.

This, I feel, is a three-part war. Between the West (and their allies), Syria (and its allies), and ISIS (and whoever's funding their systematic destruction of Syria.)

Set up peace talks with Syria and the rebels to at least quiet down that front. Talk with Turkey to ease their stance against the Kurds, and you know, not attack those who are fighting ISIS for them? And, lastly, cut off ISIS and engage a sort of pincer attack.

Then again, I'm being an armchair president...


well ISIS is mostly funded by the allies of the west, and the anglo saxons.

http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/world/middleeast/article3537770.ece

http://www.lrb.co.uk/v36/n08/seymour-m-hersh/the-red-line-and-the-rat-line

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/25/world/middleeast/arms-airlift-to-syrian-rebels-expands-with-cia-aid.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

the chemical weapons...

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-22424188

 

and dont forget all the weapons ISIS found in iraq, without the US bombing the shit out of em like the doctrin would call for...

and the air war turkey started some months ago against the enemys of ISIS(thats turning more and more into a groundwar)

yemen is another place where western "allies" fight alongside ISIS

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/06/30/us-yemen-security-islamicstate-insight-idUSKCN0PA1T920150630