By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Rustuv said:
generic-user-1 said:

The review has as much effort put into it as the game.lol

But reallythe game has a 42 on metacritic so seems not many thought it was good.

the review is full of bias against this kind of games, it could have been a great game and the rewiew wouldnt be much different. 

there are to many bad reviewer out there, and this is one of them, not polygon bad, but still realy bad.

and for the 42 on meta, i guess the game deserved it, its way to toned down and teen friendly, they should have went all out with the violence and gore.

peopel like gore, a guy named AL(L) gore even was elected as president of the usa(but got scammed out of it)


Um, the game is still rated M for mature and it still has a ton of gore in it... so yeah that part is bull $#!t. Itagaki said it was toned down he was referring to the difficulty not the violence. Frankly you have uet to say one thing that makes me think you are not biased. Which is fine really I hope you are very happy with this game. Frankly though this game has the same stink on it as Duke Nukem Forever and DaiKatana.


uhh its rated M, lke i care, i wanted a game thats so brutal and full of gore that some stupid people  want to ban it.

and the game has the same problem as Duke Nukem Forever thats right, both are way to toned down because they wanted them to sell way above the bonderies of it normal market, and now nobody is realy happy with the game.