mornelithe said:
More importantly, the Judge due to prior case law couldn't rule on the evidence. Precedent had already been set, it's why many many people were confused when he spent the first hearing grilling the NFL on their actual evidence. Which is concerning in and of itself, really. If you take Brady/Pats out of this and realize that in a case where the facts are clearly wrong, the Judge cannot overturn an arbitration award, on those points. |
I have a feeling that portion of the CBA will get reworked when the current one expires.









