Super Mario Maker - Metacritic: 89

[Goodnightmoon]

Torillian said:

Goodnightmoon said:

A 7 from a site nobody cares can bring down a whole point of the score of a game, but it needs 2 perfect 100 to recover what a simple 7 has done. Metacritic system is really unbalanced.

Isn't that just how math and averages work?  I mean metacritic uses a weighted average so this site noone knows about probably has less of an effect than a 10 from something higher, but this is just how averages work on a scale with a set maximum.  What would you suggest as a balanced system?

The problem is combining different scores systems on the same table, some webs give 7 and 6 easily when a game is decent or good while other sites only give a 70 to an extremely mediocre game, most of the webs score between 70 - 100 and anything below that is utter shit, being 70 already mediocre, so when you combine those different systems the result is a mess, and also is funny that a 7 is more imprtant than a 10, since the 7 is drowing the score a whole point but the next 10 will not be able to raise it up. Maybe a good solution would be cutting some of the very best and very worst scores out of the table.