Ljink96 said:
Miyamotoo said:
Ljink96 said:
Miyamotoo said:
Ljink96 said:
Still looks like Gamecube 1.5 to me. I've seen better looking games on Wii:(
Wait, why does the Starfox Segment in Bayonetta 2 look better than this? They could at least said, "we'll try to base the graphics around this". Man, usually it wouldn't bother me much about graphics. But with a game like Starfox, a game that always boasted great visuals as well as gameplay, it's kind of a setback. With the Scifi genre, it isn't necessarily difficult to create stunning graphics...I guess Nintendo just wasn't looking for that.
|
Do you realise that Wii is basically 1.5 Gamecube!?
Because Bayonetta 2 doesn't work in locked 60FPS on two screens.
|
Nah, Gamecube 2.0 Would be Wii. This is somewhere between Wii and Gamecube in some screens.
Still, there have been games that look just as decent as Bayo 2, XCX and MK8, of which MK8 runs at 60fps. There's no reason to justify the graphics other than it's a budget title.
|
Mario Kart runs on 60 fps, but this runs 2x 60 fps.
Well if its a budget title Nintendo would price it like budget title, like Toads Treasure Tracker or Kirby with $39 price point not $59. Also Toads Treasure Tracker is one of the best looking games and it have price $39, why!? Because of content, not because a graphics.
|
Oh, believe me, I'm gonna buy it no matter what it costs. 60$ seems fair enough. I'm a 3D major so with the programs we have, it's natural for me to say a game like this doesn't look good. I mean, it's acceptable, gorgeous at times. But the graphics aren't what I'm really into. If the content and gameplay are great, i can stomach the graphics.
|
Like I said numerous times in this thread, this isnt best looking Wii U game but certainly not worst, we already know it will run on 60FPS, we will have very different experience with two screens than any other game, game looks fun and we will probably have a decent content because Nintendo wouldnt price it $60.
So I really don't see any problem here.
