| DerNebel said: ... |
Again this is you not reading what's in front of you properly, you've literally only focused your attention on a few choice lines to try and justify your argument. 1 and 2 were responding to you attempting to paint views as sales, 3 and 4 highlights what I mean in that views don't equal that and 5 was responding to you dismissing traditional marketing in your attempt to argue YT equals sales.
Those posts weren't dismissing potential they were dismissing your whole notion of views to sales the's a difference, revenue highlights money being generated this however doesn't mean a company is bigger. The is no way Nintendo was bigger then MS and Sony combined, they were making more money yes but the latter are involved in multiple huge markets with notable standing in each, these companies lost as much money as Nintendo earned and are still here fine as ever that's a testament to how much bigger they are. Bigger is not just money generated, the angle I'm looking at it is one that's more from a value investing view though where size is assessed through multiple things from assets held, staff etc...
Majority of companies using YT now doesn't mean they disagree as many companies hop on something early to benefit in the long run, it's a common thing to do ever since people realized if you don't get your foot in the door now you'll be in the long queue later on. Like me they probably see the potential in the long run so want to help it grow to reap the reward years down the line when the potential is reached.
