Kasz216 said:
Actually... the guys from IGN and gamespot. People who have been playing Pro Evo for 8+ years are going to biased towards the PS2/PS3 control scheme because they are used to it. A great number of people who have only played console FPS think Dual Analog is better then Mouse and Keyboard when any impartial observer will tell you that Mouse and keypad will destroy dual analog. To them, even when they try it out, mouse and keyboard seems infeiror because they aren't used to a new control style. Hell it happens in sports games in the US ALL THE TIME. People with the Xbox version who are used to Xbox controls would always want to play that, people with PS2s always wanted to play the PS2 version, each saying the other was worse, and using a slightly different controller to explain away their sucking. This is going to be even more prounced when the changes are drastic. The difference here is that all the Wii version does is add in ways to make passing more accurate. How could anyone say that's bad and be unbiased?
|
ok, your argument I could switch upside down, I can say, how can anyone better know what a good Pro Evo is than guys who have played it for many years? and you also say passing is more accurate, that's great, but besides defending being more difficult, you say ''How could anyone say that's bad (passing being more accurate) and be unbiased'', but no one even said passing being more accurate is bad in the first place.. the discussion was about whether many football game fans would chose the Wii version over a PS3 or 360 version.
''Hadouken!''







