By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
reggin_bolas said:
Of course gay couples can still adopt but their relationship never amounts to anything more than a civil union.

Look guys, all laws and statutes are essentially discriminatory. Young people can't buy alcohol for example. Men can't work at places like hooters (as waiters).

The reason it's very important to add a new amendment is to avoid persecuting Christians and other religions. We know the SC decision will open up the floodgates for litigation against clergy and other organizations if they refuse to wed same-sex couples in their places of worship.

Also this whole spiel about love and it doesn't harm anyone is just bunkum. If that's the main reasoning then a man can marry a tree for example. It doesn't harm anyone right? The guy is in love right? The line has to be drawn.

If people start winning those litigations then I'll become concerned but not before.  The idea that the government has to allow gay couples to get legally married now should not have any effect on what religious organizations decide to do as they aren't part of the government.  

The line is drawn at any number of individuals with consent.  That negates animals, objects, and children.  



...