By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
FinalFantasyer on 29 August 2015
Edit Thread
DevilRising said:
FinalFantasyer said:
Oh jeez, who to trust! Nintendo fanboys who finally got an exclusive 3rd party game or non-biased professional video game reviewers who do this for a living. Hmmmm....

That can go both ways.


"Professional" game reviewers are absolutely biased. There has not been a single un-biased one since the mid-90s. There was a time when actual game journalists who works for magazines like EGM and GamePro back when they were actually good, really DID give legitimately unbiased reviews, meaning that they reviewed the merits of the game, regardless of their personal opinions of it, or personal tastes. GamePro most especially, was the best at this in the early to mid 90s, because their ratings system did not have an aggregate score. They would rate each aspect of a game individually, from graphics, sounds, controls, fun factor, etc., so they would let you know if, say, a game had great graphics but shitty sound, or shitty gameplay. Or a game with crap graphics but amazing gameplay. Because they would score each thing seperately, and the reviews themselves would be an unbiased look at what the game is about. Period.

Zero personal opinions, just the facts of the game. And that was great, it was reliable.

 

Now? Not a chance. Even outlets that try to put forth an air of unbiasedness, such as GameTrailers, fail. IGN once had an ounce of credibility, but that too was many, many years ago.

 

These days, all ANY "professional" reviewer is, is no more or less than some gamer, just like any one of us, who just so happens to get paid to give their personal opinions. And that's it. Nothing unbiased or "professional" about it at all, except that they're getting paid, so they "must know what they're talking about".

 

On the other hand, yes gamer reviews and non-paid opinions are biased. Of course they are. EVERY opinion is biased, that is the nature of opinion. But I have found, at times, that you can trust "fan reviews" sometimes more than "pro reviews", because there have been cases where they will actually tell you more of what the game is about, and not just trying to get clicks, views, etc.

 

Either way, it would not surprise me at all that this game has wonky cameras, controls, a half-baked story, etc., but that is only because that has been how EVERY Itagaki game, especially the Ninja Gaiden 3D games, have always been. He was never known for high quality. And yet many people claimed to love his NG games, or DoA, or whatever.


One biased reviewer, two biased reviewers, three biased reviewers....how many of them do you suggest are biased? Because a couple of dozens of reviewers have reviewed D3rd and all gave it horrendous reviews. I doubt they all just picked a random game to hate on. There are tons of games out there who get fantastic feedback from all reviewers, so i dunno where this alleged bias comes from. And i doubt all reviewers get paid from developers for their scores or else they'll give out low scores, becauee that's the silliest thing i ever heard. Do you think Rockstar paid all the hundreds of critics who gave GTA 10/10? Please. Like you said, they are gamers too. Professional ones. Not angry fanboys who hate everything that isn't made from their favorite developer.