By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Robert_Downey_Jr. said:
Emperorbach said:
amazing film,but pretty accurate
OH AND
Age of Ultron?

Mediocre!

Jurassic World?

Mediocre!

Terminator: Genysis?

*anguished scream*
had me rolling
sad that they were all average

except Age of Ultron was better than Mad Max.  Sorry but it can't make up for a lack of dialogue and character development and general acting (other than Theron) AND a forgettable villain with just practical effects.  It can win all the awards for stunts and visuals as it deserves all those but AoU had a much better story and better acting (from yours truly) as well as a deeper villain (no he didn't just make jokes pay attention to the dialogue)

except it wsant age of ultron was the dictionary definition of dissapointment

ultron was pretty meh

all the scenes and quips ( which they were too many off ) all felt better in the trailers

there was too much forced into the movie with lttle pay off

vision was cool but everyone else was meh 

quicksilvers death felt kinda cheap

also incredibly incredibly silly plot holes that made no sense , loool ultron really made a bomb he had to push instead of wirelessly

why not create chaos in the world , crash stocks empty bank accounts , leave the avengers distracted

sha sha it was serviceable , BUT MEDIOCRE