By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Samus Aran on 22 August 2015
Edit Thread
Mummelmann said:
Samus Aran said:
Mummelmann said:
 


And thus we arrived at my entire point; citing lack of content as a reason why Titanfall should be deducted is ridiculous if one does not concede that the same should apply for Splatoon.

Titanfall was actually noted for having a lack of content, but not great enough to warrant further deductions.

It did happen to Splatoon, so it should also happen to Titanfall. Yet it didn't. Titanfall has less content than Splatoon currently has.

Titanfall was cited and deducted for having a lack of content by several reviwers, just not as big as Splatoon upon launch. If one title has less content and both get flack for it; it's only natural that the title with the least content get the bigger deduction for lack of content. Besides, content is only one aspect, it is also entirely possible that the majority of reviewers simply see Titanfall as the superior online competitive shooter, which may seem ridiculous to someone who loves Splatoon and doesn't like Titanfall.
The fact that Splatoon isn't even aimed at the same audience should also, of course, be tallied into the equation, another thing people seem to forget.

I can't really object to either since I haven't played any of them, and the fact that I don't own either should be a clear enough indication of my personal opinion of their value(s).

 

Titanfall is just another FPS, it doesn't stand out or does something new. I mean Titanfall has 6 online modes of which 4 are practically the same. I really have no idea how it got such a high score.