By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Samus Aran on 22 August 2015
Edit Thread
Mummelmann said:
Samus Aran said:
Mummelmann said:
Samus Aran said:

Most games on PS/XBOX tend to get overinflated scores. I mean, just check the games that got over 90%+.

Look at Arkham City on the Wii U, it got 11 points less on average. Then look at games like Journey, TLOU: R, Fez, Bastion, Flower, Shovel Knight (PS4), etc.

Titanfall, with no singleplayer campaign and not a lot of content got 86%. Halo: MCC, who's online still doesn't work correctly, is sitting at 85%.


Maybe they were completely justified in it since it got more content later on? It doesn't matter how much content a game launches with; what matters is that gets more content added later.

Titanfall is practically dead online already. And no reviewer took that into account with Splatoon, so why should they take it into account with Titanfall?


And thus we arrived at my entire point; citing lack of content as a reason why Titanfall should be deducted is ridiculous if one does not concede that the same should apply for Splatoon.

Titanfall was actually noted for having a lack of content, but not great enough to warrant further deductions.

It did happen to Splatoon, so it should also happen to Titanfall. Yet it didn't. Titanfall has less content than Splatoon currently has.