By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
gabzjmm23 on 22 August 2015
Edit Thread
HoloDust said:
Mummelmann said:
Samus Aran said:

Most games on PS/XBOX tend to get overinflated scores. I mean, just check the games that got over 90%+.

Look at Arkham City on the Wii U, it got 11 points less on average. Then look at games like Journey, TLOU: R, Fez, Bastion, Flower, Shovel Knight (PS4), etc.

Titanfall, with no singleplayer campaign and not a lot of content got 86%. Halo: MCC, who's online still doesn't work correctly, is sitting at 85%.


Maybe they were completely justified in it since it got more content later on? It doesn't matter how much content a game launches with; what matters is that gets more content added later.

Hahaha...you mean, just like that other certain game? (wink, wink, nudge, nudge)

OT: Still playing Zombi, still thinking it's worth $20, still scoring it around 7.5. Never tried it on WiiU, but from what I've been playing so far, I think scanner on Gamepad would annoy me really quick given how much it annoys me even in this form.


That is your opinion. The problem is the reviewer didnt mention those type of things in his review. They are under one gaming organization (IGN). If the reviewer really didnt bother to compare then it is really not a good review since it is a port. A ported game can really have a better score than the original one but they need to justify it which the reviewer have failed to do.