Samus Aran said:
KingdomHeartsFan said:
Samus Aran said:
Most games on PS/XBOX tend to get overinflated scores. I mean, just check the games that got over 90%+.
Look at Arkham City on the Wii U, it got 11 points less on average. Then look at games like Journey, TLOU: R, Fez, Bastion, Flower, Shovel Knight (PS4), etc.
Titanfall, with no singleplayer campaign and not a lot of content got 86%. Halo: MCC, who's online still doesn't work correctly, is sitting at 85%.
|
They don't have the same amount of reviews, and the reviews say they took off points cause of framerate issues and glitches, another mentions some gimmicks that do more harm than good, "You can use the right stick to aim, but the gyroscope still registers and can throw the reticule off slightly."
All those PS4 ports are superior to the PS3 versions in every way, Batman Arkham City obviously doesn't fit that criteria.
|
Lol, my PC from 1960 can run Fez, Bastion, Shovel Knight and Flower (hyperbole). What's so superior about those ports? Shovel Knight is the exact same game.
I never said Arkham City on Wii U was scored unfairly btw. Not at all the point I was making.
The changes in most of these "remasters"/ports are so few that they don't deserve so much praise.
|
Who cares if the changes are few, they are reviewing the game, they aren't reviewing the changes between ports. If the game is still great its gonna get a good score lol, it would be retarded for a reviewer to take points off a games score cause its similar to another version.
