| sundin13 said: "They were trying to claim that they had an 'expectation of privacy' and this it was ok for them to steal and destroy (eat) evidence." |
Hun? They were claiming, through the Police Union, that the evidence against them was illegally obtained and they can not be prosecuted. In California it is illegal to record someone without their consent, they were claiming the evidence of their wrongdoing could not be used because they did not give consent.
The judge rejected their claim. They can be prosecuted.
Other questions?







