mornelithe said:
Well, I can't speak for Torillian, because I don't read a ton of his writing. However, I made this trust remark earlier, and his lack of a response to open a dialogue about it, isn't exactly encouraging. |
You wanted a dialogue on that one? Seemed like a reasonable response that people should find specific writers they like to forego these issues, I generally don't post "yeah I agree" while at work because I'm busy. Did you mean that the standard should be to assume all writers are unthuthful until you specifically learn that they are not? Guilty until proven innocent basically? If so then no I disagree, but it's not really something I'd want to debate about. Regardless of the current state of the journalism industry by stance is that it is perfectly rational and normal to change one's mind when presented with new evidence and that should not be a sign of someone being untrustworthy.
...
