By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Wyrdness said:
midrange said:


I have played the game, I do not own the game. By free for all, I meant that they should solely focus on free for all and beef up the local multiplayer if they decided voice chat (which is important in team gameplay) wasn't worthwhile. Clearly you think voice chat wouldn't help, I think otherwise, so why not add it as an OPTION for people like me? 

Splatoon is not like other shooters, but it is still a shooter. If the new smash bros only had 4 fighters to choose from, people would be in an outrage seeing as how most fighters have more. People were annoyed when sunspace was removed, but they more than made up for it through other features, what does splatoon have to make up for the poor local coop?

I have actually played through wonderful 101 fully, but I didn't need to to see reviewers were right about the learning curve. "Reviewers also sucked hard at games like wonderful 101." Of course they did, the tutorial was pathetic. Many times I had to look up ways to beat things and realized I had an ability that could help all along. That's not fun, that's frustrating. If you're into those kinds of games, knock yourself out, but gotg should be appealing to all, not the elite few


Have you played the game thoroughly though because a few hours is nothing compared to high rank battles, free for all already exists in the games approach this is why in Splatoon matches can be won in seconds, all you'd hear in chat would be things your map is already telling you or insults, as far as matches go I don't think it won't change much I already know it won't as it's down to the individual's assessment of the situation.

Again Splatoon is not like other shooters so trying to use other shooters as a comparison is just silly and broken no other way to put it it's just a misguided argument like when people were arguing Halo has multiplayer so Metroid Prime should over a decade ago, two completely different creatures and the same applies here. You're using Smash as an argument but that's broken as well because the game already has previous entries if you look at the first Smash game compared to other fighters it was pretty similar to Splatoon in it's differences to other games, it had less characters and modes compared to most fighting games at the time.

Right now your argument hinges on local co-op a feature 90% of shooters released now days don't even have at all, Halo 5 won't even have split screen so this says it all about the arguments you're trying to push in claiming standards of the genre yet the genre itself isn't entertaining the feature you're focused on. Splatoon has a ton of other content to make up for its co-op feature and even gives free regular DLC something not many shooters are doing.

Wonderful 101's tutorial is no different to that of Bayonetta and DMC, fact it is many reviewers just sucked at the game and you yourself it seemed no offence, it's funny because when Nintendo added Fi into Skyward Sword the same people moaned about hand holding but when W101 gives you the basics and leaves you to figure things out on your own accord complaints come the other way from the same people. Fact is the game tells you the basics and all abilities and items have descriptions on what they do, if you don't have a brain that can put 2 and 2 together in that regard it's not the games fault sorry.


Again, voice chat OPTION. You think it won't help, don't use it. If others think it will help, give them the option to do so, or don't complain when others are annoyed by this missing feature.

I was referring to the original smash bros. Also, would splatoon get a free pass if the balancing is broken because it's not a traditional shooter? Would splatoon get a free pass if it only had 2 maps to choose from? Would it get a free pass if the online mode was glitchy and laggy? Would it get a free pass for low local multiplayer content? The answer is no. Many other shooters get flak for these things. People aren't exactly praising microsoft for no coop in halo 5. Every game gets shit on if it has locked on disk dlc. You can't just say "but splatoon is unique" as a cop out and reviewers know this.

Yes , I am talking about a feature (local coop) that games should have. For all the shit cod gets, I actually admire how they added local multiplayer, and I'm also looking forward to the zombies mode (something that was unnecessary but a great and substantial addition).

If a game doesn't get local coop, then I expect it to be replaced with something substantial, like a character rpg tree in destiny, or a huge world to explore in metroid prime. What does splatoon have to make not only equal to the previously mentioned games, but better (to be gotg)?

Wonderful 101 had an abysmal tutorial, and looking back taking the time to figure stuff out is what made the game unenjoyable. Platinum games shouldn't expect every user to research moves in order to enjoy the game. Some people are into that, but not everyone is. some people just don't give a rats ass and want to enjoy the game from the get go. If wonderful 101 decides to ignore that fact, then it deserves to have the low sales and reviews that it did get. You can't just say that everyone who didn't like the game sucked.