By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Aeolus451 on 06 August 2015
Edit Thread
LudicrousSpeed said:
Aeolus451 said:
LudicrousSpeed said:


And others should really stop pretending to know more about the market than the head of one of the console companies. Its entertaining to read, but your logic doesnt really hold water.

If its such a given that PS4 has a higher userbase and thus will get more sales, theres no reason for Actvision to not take a deal with MS and try to improve sales there. Its not as if the Xbox deal ever slowed down PS CoD sales. Its still the top selling franchise everywhere. 

Unless, of course, MS simply didnt make an offer, or made an offer that Sony simply outmatched. And no, a higher userbase isnt that offer.

Its hilarious reading these threads and seeing how hard it is for some to accept that Sony is spending a lot of money on all these deals.

They don't need to spend alot of money on these deals to give the devs incentive to make their game or content exclusive to the PS4. You're living up to your name with some of the things you post. You completely tucked your tail and ran in that other thread because of the flak you caught for your post. 

I know, I know. When MS is buying up content or games and spending money it's massive amounts of money that would probably fund 20 games. When Sony does it, the deals probably cost them ten bucks. Again, it's entertaining to read, but doesn't really mesh with reality. Especially when it comes to a game like Call of Duty. Obviously the situation is very different for one of the random Japanese games most people don't care about.

Regarding the other thread, idk, I think I got one quote? I clicked on it when it was blue just to get rid of that and it's remained ever since. Furthermore, and most importantly, I said in the very post you're referencing that it would be my last post in the thread. So I am not sure how any future "flak" is relevant, but by all means, lets see more of your entertaining logic. Before I posted there were 2-3 or more posts basically saying Spencer was pandering to stupid people so there was really no point in trying to have any rational discussion in the thread.

I hope that helps.

It would cost MS more to moneyhat while it would cost Sony less. To the bolded part, you're exaggerating in the hopes that a sensible concept somehow becomes ridiculous all of a sudden. Very much like you did before.

You were quoted multiple times in that other thread but you didn't respond to any of it but except for one. After the very end of your reply "This thread is a joke already though with all the insults, Im out". You knew more than one person responded to your first post and you read those. Your first post in that thread showed exactly how rational you wanted to discuss things and other users responded to you in kind. Trillions sounds so rational of you.