By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Aeolus451 on 06 August 2015
Edit Thread
Wagram said:
Aeolus451 said:
FloatingWaffles said:


Because according to some people when Sony does it it's a smart business move but when Microsoft does it it's because they're pure evil apparently. /s


The only time I really see anyone saying "moneyhatting is evil" is people like you guys in situations like this. Hardly any sony fans were upset over TR being a timed exclusive. It's just business regardless who's acquiring the exclusivity deals.

Actually, that's false. Tomb Raider sells more on PS than it does Xbox, and a LOT of people are pissed and very salty over it. Rightfully so in my opinion. Unless the title was financially unable to be started without the help of the backer then moneyhatting is wrong simply because it denies consumers the ability to play on their system. Tomb Raider is a multi million seller franchise, SE did it solely to hedge risk risk on their end. It would have been built, published, and sold regardless of MSFT.

I want it on PC and there isn't a chance in hell i'm supporting a purchase on Xbox One over that specific money hat.


I meant that from my prospective, I don't see many sony fans mad over it but honestly, I don't frequent any other gaming forum or youtube gaming channels where I might see it. On here, most of the sony fans aren't upset over it. Personally, I'm not bothered by it even though I played those games since the first one on sega saturn (I think). If MS got full exclusivity with FFXV or Dark Souls 3, I would be upset but I don't think the xbox division's allowance from MS is big enough to get those and those types of games do better on playstation consoles.