Phil Spencer: Fewer 3rd party exclusives, focus is on 1st party

[ArchangelMadzz]

S.T.A.G.E. said:

ArchangelMadzz said:

You don't know how burden of proof works. The person making the claim has to provide evidence for the claim.

I always said big franchise. Something people look forward to, something someone thinks of when they see Xbox. 'Halo' was not created under a microsoft studio, Bungie were acquired by microsoft during development. Halo by 343 is just a continuation of that xD But it's nice to see all the IP you think of a franchises that people associate with Xbox. Kudos.

I stated before they launched Driveclub in an unforgivable state, and unfortunatly for them the game is very good.

I never said that, I'm saying Driveclub wasn't bundled with every single PS4. I've literally repeated this point 3 times now.

Killzone? Really?  70, 91, 84 73 = a BAD IP? Not even average but BAD? Okay dude xD And Driveclub launched awfully but it's by no means a bad game. Some people who played it consider it average which is fair enough everyone's entitled to their opinion but if you want to call it bad you can..

Yep. Microsoft really screwed Apples chances of joining the gaming race by taking Halo for them, because it was originally them publishing Halo in the first place. The look on Jobs face after Microsoft bought Bungie must've been priceless. He must've been like "F'n Microsoft screws me again!"

Holy crap though, imagine if Apple did have Halo, the gaming world would be so different today. Xbox would've done so much worse, if the 360 still had RROD that'd be it. We could see a Apple/Sony/Nintendo console race, although they probably aren't too sour about it since the whole iPod iPhone thing happened..