sasquatchmontana said:
I didn't, i'm just suggesting how a relatively minor push on a system feature could have been the defiining element of a gaming series. I said it would difficult to define where the publisher and developer contribution ends and begins and if you did want to state MS din't have any involvement in it (aside from the money) then you would need to prove it.
And you could only think of Forza on Xbox?
What about just 1.5 Million PS4's? Is 2 million the baseline for flagship IP on Playstation?
No I'm just confused that you seem to demerit Kinect Adventures because it was a bad game or bundled a lot. but also listed bad PS IPs or not so bads ones that had been bundled a lot. |
Again, I'm not the one making the claim that Microsoft had Tonnes of involvement. I was given an example that in my opinion meant nothing. I need evidence to confirm that Microsoft made such huge contributions that lead to the commercial and critical success of the gears franchise.
Can you think of a big franchise that was created by a microsoft studio other than Forza?
No, I never said it was the baseline. I'm saying it was announced to have sold 2 million which makes it a success. Despite it's unforgivable launch issues it's actually a really good game aswell.
Kinect Adventures wasn't just bundles a lot, it came with every 360 with Kinect. It's like counting Knack Japanese sales, it came with every PS4. I'm not going to say Knack is a big successful IP because it sold 300k units day one. I named bad IP's? Like what? Driveclub? Day 1 sure, but now? Some websites have even taken the liberty of re-reviewing it as it's a completely different game http://www.gamesradar.com/driveclub-review/
But please tell me all the bad PS IP I named.
There's only 2 races: White and 'Political Agenda'
2 Genders: Male and 'Political Agenda'
2 Hairstyles for female characters: Long and 'Political Agenda'
2 Sexualities: Straight and 'Political Agenda'
