With the News From SE (about DQXI), Possibility of FFXV and/or KH3 Appearing on Nintendo "NX"?

[FunFan]

Wonktonodi said:

Wyrdness said:

outlawauron said:

But it does. He's using 6 games (all of which have received numerous ports and remakes to many platforms) as justification for a good relationship with a publisher. What has happened recently (MS paying for 360 version of FF13 + Tomb Raider) is more relevant than FF1-6.

If FF15 goes to NX or any other Nintendo platform, it'll be because it's very successful and won't require a lot of resources to port over.

No it doesn't as it seems you never read the post he was replying to to, someone claimed the was never a relationship between Nintendo and SE in regards to FF and he's highlighting that the was, even SE remade FF4 for DS without Nintendo paying anything for it as part of a good relationship feel free to read the quotes as SE were going to remake the game for PS2 but then Nintendo asked SE for a flagship title for DS so they remade it for DS instead, he's not far off in what he's saying.

He was trying to say the relationship had been better with nintendo by limiting the data(ignoring the MMOs and direct sequals to X and XIII and then being wrong about some of it. pointing out ports of PS titles while ignoring the ones for the ones on Nintendo. Plus leaving out that it wasn't that strong of a partnership because several of the games never went outside Japan on the NES or SNES.

While what I said "doesn't change what he said" what he said was selective, wrong and not a strong case for future games on the system.

If SE decide to put KH or FF on the next Nintendo system it will not be beacuse of games on the NES or SNES but because of current reasons. Like if the port is easy to make, if they think it will have enough sales.

I did eventually admitted and corrected my mistake about the PC ports in another post since I didn't remembered they were late ports. I thought they came at the same time. Been a long time. So you can ignore that and simply put 5 unquestionable playstation exclusives.

I didnt include the MMOs because honestly, they are numbered Final Fantasy's for marketing purposes only. And the sequels? They are usually more side stories than anything else. Besides there has been sequels to mainline FFs in Nintendo platforms too (Final Fantasy XII: Revenant Wings and Final Fantasy IV: The After Years) so it isnt a big deal. But if I included those we all would be fighting about the merits of one sequel over another. And is for the same reason I didnt included all those DS/PSP remakes and other non numbered Final Fantasy's, some of them are Nintendo exclusives (Crystal Cronicles, Crystal Bearers, Chocobo Dungeons, My Life as a King or older games like the Final Fantasy Legends, Mistic Quest). Final Fantasy has been milked to death and the disscussion including everything would stink.

Simply including the main offline games and if they were exclusives during the generation they came out simplifies things and drives the point home. Which was that Nintendo had (past tense) a better relationship with Final Fantasy than the current one Microsoft has, which is getting FFXV. Not a single Microsoft fan has questioned it. The only whiners are Sony fanboys that are salty that Nintendo happened to end with a bigger number.

No one is questioning the relationship with Sony and if you include all the cheese (port, remake, MMO, subseries etc) there is no doubt that Sony comes on top. But Nintendo will be far from last place and, like I said, the last place is still getting XV so why cant the NX have it. Assuming it can handle it and its not a comercial bust (DUH!).