By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Wonktonodi on 29 July 2015
Edit Thread
Wyrdness said:
outlawauron said:

But it does. He's using 6 games (all of which have received numerous ports and remakes to many platforms) as justification for a good relationship with a publisher. What has happened recently (MS paying for 360 version of FF13 + Tomb Raider) is more relevant than FF1-6.

If FF15 goes to NX or any other Nintendo platform, it'll be because it's very successful and won't require a lot of resources to port over.

No it doesn't as it seems you never read the post he was replying to to, someone claimed the was never a relationship between Nintendo and SE in regards to FF and he's highlighting that the was, even SE remade FF4 for DS without Nintendo paying anything for it as part of a good relationship feel free to read the quotes as SE were going to remake the game for PS2 but then Nintendo asked SE for a flagship title for DS so they remade it for DS instead, he's not far off in what he's saying.

He was trying to say the relationship had been better with nintendo by limiting the data(ignoring the MMOs and direct sequals to X and XIII and then being wrong about some of it. pointing out ports of PS titles while ignoring the ones for the ones on Nintendo. Plus leaving out that it wasn't that strong of a partnership because several of the games never went outside Japan on the NES or SNES.

While what I said "doesn't change what he said" what he said was selective, wrong and not a strong case for future games on the system.

If SE decide to put KH or FF on the next Nintendo system it will not be beacuse of games on the NES or SNES but because of current reasons. Like if the port is easy to make, if they think it will have enough sales.