By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
LuckyTrouble on 28 July 2015
Edit Thread
Wyrdness said:


You do know SE have little say over DQ and that the franchise belongs solely to Horii? SE can't considered it as the entire control of the franchise is not under them it's under Horii they just have a contract to publish his games in Japan, this is why Nintendo has been publishing the games in the west. The higher ups in SE don't phase the DQ mob.

Look at the situation yourself why would they already consider a platform no one knows anything about and even already commit DQX to it, how can they commit DQX to it when they don't have a grasp of what to expect espcially when they have 3 versions of DQX to pick from to port over? SE never made a consideration for Wii U or 3DS in regards to DQX for Wii U and a KH game for 3DS. Under consideration is not something you say about something no one knows anything about in regards to a brand new flagship title.

The answer is simply they already know what to expect and have seen what a working NX can do, saying DQXI is coming for it tips people off as if NX is a dedicated handheld it would have BC and not need a new version which means NX is likely a console and they'll need as many console versions as possible to gain back sales in Japan for the console version and sadly the other candidates X1 is dead on arrival and Wii U is soon to be replaced by the looks of it which leaves its successor. This is why the PR team would not be happy as it's not a hard dot to connect.

I see that you have absolutely no understanding of the power of an exclusive publishing contract. SE can veto anything they don't think will be worth it. Anything. SE has way more say than you might think.

The rest of your post is just not worth responding to. No offense, but it's a lot of baseless assumptions that I'll get absolutely nowhere responding to.