starcraft said:
I'd defer to BMaker's post. Microsoft helping to fund this game (in the same vein that Sony often does) has bought them a full year's exclusivity over their rival console. Now we could have a big debate about the merits of these sorts of deals, but MS and Sony would be equally guilty. Certainly a full year is a lot more than many of the sorts of people you refer too were expecting - including yourself I believe! |
Well we were expecting 6 months ( like the most solid source was telling) but Uncharted 4 delay changed everything for Square Enix, so they surely changed their planning to avoid it.
And i dont really see what it has do with my post , but i dont think we would end the debate by saying they are equally guilty, at least not on this generation, if we had one. Timed exclusive DLC( most people really dont care, including me) is really not the same thing than a real timed exclusive on a full game only because you paid for it while the game could have been made on both consoles without your funding like Rayman Legends ( at the beginning) and Tomb Raider. ( otherwise it wouldnt be timed) You cant compare a Bayonetta 2/SFV situation to a Rayman Legends/Tomb Raider 2 situation, they are totally different, the simple fact one is timed and the other not should be enough to understand. When the funding and partnership is not necessary to make the deal, the deal is always timed
Predictions for end of 2014 HW sales:
PS4: 17m XB1: 10m WiiU: 10m Vita: 10m







