Fire Emblem Fates over sexualization is really off putting imo (pics)

[generic-user-1]

OnlyForDisplay said:

generic-user-1 said:

OnlyForDisplay said:

WhiteSky said:

is that for you too much? 

Sadly, for me, this answer truly depends on ones personal views White-San. This issue is constant throughout multimedia entertainment. Even some people viewed StarFire from the New 52 a form of artistic freedom. The big question still is "Where do both devs. and gamers draw the line between artistic freedom and over sexualization?"

there is no line because over sexualization IS artistic freedom.  if the artist would choose to make everybody naked, thats totaly fine, its his vision and not the vision of some hardliners of the victorian age...  go to saudi arabia if you cant stand half naked women.

I do understand generic-san, but my point is more directed from a morality standpoint of what is considered acceptable and vise versa. Some people do find over sexualization offensive and sexist. Others find it a work of art. From my point of view, in terms of morality, said question sadly does not have a concrete answer.

i cant imagine a good moral system that is against adult persons in sexy pose. sure there are some, but i dont care about the stupid ideas of some people who used the desert as toilet... the important civilisations had all no problem with boobs and wieners. (its hard to find greek, roman or indian(india) art without boobs and/or wieners.)

and how can oversexualization be sexist if both genders are sexualized?