Fire Emblem Fates over sexualization is really off putting imo (pics)

[IkePoR]

Aeolus451 said:

RolStoppable said:

Her being a morph means that she is an enemy and that's the key point. It changes the context and how she is viewed. For example, a protagonist who kills innocent people can be morally unacceptable to some players, but an antagonist who kills innocent people would be acceptable. It's a matter of a character being a good fit for their designated role and that's why nobody has ever had a problem with Sonia. She looks like a bitch, but that's fine because she is one. Actually, there would be a problem if she didn't look like one.

But when it comes to protagonists, a lot of people would rather see classy women, not girls that are dressed up like sluts.

I doubt that. If people wanted to see classy women, female characters would look like church ladies. Attactive women for the most part these days don't dress classy (doesn't mean that they can't but rather they choose not to).

How very extreme.  Class does not automatically mean nun.  But I'm not even arguing that; I prefer women that dress with self respect/dignity.  A woman can be attractive in a t-shirt and capris.  Why is it impossible for a girl to be sexy or fan service without wearing see-though blouses and bikinis?