Halo:MCC still in top 20 worldwide. No PS4 2015 Exclusive is in top 50.

[cpg716]

MikeRox said:

cpg716 said:

I also think X1 made the mistake of not beefing up the power. I mean. I know the could not know EXACTLY what PS4 was doing..  But they did know they were going to offer a $499 system. They could have worked with a GPU they knew was capable of pushing out more power, especially since they WANTED Kinect 2 to be a big part of the system (when it used up resources games could use).    Just seems like poor planning.   I am mad at the PS4 in a sense for the same thing. These consles should have been made where 1080p/60FPS was EASY to do on DAY ONE.. EVERY GAME.  Unless both Sony and Microsoft KNEW this was going to be a shorter generation..  The X2 and PS5 will be like PC upgrade mainly..    16GB of RAM/ 4k GPUs..  still able to play older games at lower rez (and better if developers tweak ) but new games will be 4k..

To be fair, they're both perfectly capable of running games at 1080/60fps. However, when devs target 30fps, they develop accordingly. The more you push the visuals the more you have to compromise in other areas.

If 60fps and 1080p resolution were the biggest priorities, the visuals on games would be adopted accordingly to meet this specification.

More power inside the system would in these cases simply lead to even more polygons/lighting effects etc going into the games.

No.. Games that are 720p, 900p on PS4 are 1080p and up on PC..     Games that are 1080p on PS4 are not on X1..  Point is..  If they had more powerful GPU's there would be no COMPROMISING. They have to do that now, because they have to balance resources on consoles because of the CPU/GPUs used.

More powerful CPU/GPUs would would lead to better looks games.. we know this..because PCs exist..  same goes for FPS.. Games that are capped at 30fps on console, are NOT on PC.. and those games look better..