| Nuvendil said: Well the question oddly presents a good option paired with less clear options. So for some answering the poll, "a lot" and "a whole lot" or "vast" and "very vast" may be viewed as better than "just right," which they may perceive as "medium" or "acceptable." If they had used either all neutral (very small, small, acceptable, big, verry big) or all one way or the other (too small, perfect, too big), it would be a bit more clear how people feel. |
Yeah, I have a feeling the way it was phrased confused some people. Still I wouldn't be surprised if some thought it was just too much. Especially since it was claimed that the game had around 300 hours of content, yet over 900 people out of 1,257 (perhaps not coincidentally about 70% of those polled) said they played for under 200 hours. If the 300 hours claim is to be believed, these people passed over a lot of the game's content. It's not far-fetched to think that they just didn't care about a lot of the sidequests, and may have felt that the game was a bit bloated.
("Too much content" is not a concern I myself have about the game. That's just the verdict I'm getting from the poll.)
| outlawauron said: Well, we're kinda in the age where more is better regardless of whether it's worthless while or not. Why else would playtime be a stat the people ring off every time the game is brought up? |
Must you be so antagonistic for no good reason? What was the point of this reply?
