By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
FunFan said:
tokilamockingbrd said:


exactly. Prove my point completely.

They were on the WiiU, and the versions were inferior. Inferior because the hardware is inferior. No one bought said inferior product. Again, if Nintendo wants to compete it needs the 3rd party games, and the versions it gets need to be at least comparible.

Look at the XB1. The PS4 is eating its lunch in part because a slight graphical superiority.

The main culprit is Nintendo's failure to attract the demographic that support those third parties. Graphics have something to do with it, but there are other reasons way more important. Nintendo simply doesn't have:

1. A marketing strategy that doesn't just focus on selling Yoshi and treat third parties games with the same importance as their own games.

2. A "mature" game series on the level of Halo or Uncharted in terms of popularity.

3. An online service that rivals the competition.

4. A console and controller that look SLEEK and SEXY.

5. (And least important) A technological level that doesn't feel is behing the times. (I personally think the PS4 is also behind the times. PC MASTERACE!!!!!++++++++)

About the PS4 eating the XB1 for lunch. I think that has more to do with Kinnect and the bad taste Microsoft's early anti-customers policies left. I do think that the perceived advantage in graphics did help the PS4 garner hype among the gullible, but the competitions blunders where the main reason for the win with the smarter costumer.

Disagree, mature games on Nintendo platform was never sold, and Zelda, Pokemon or Mario was popular enough to outsell those games you said above



 

NNID : ShenlongDK
PSN : DarkLong213