Dulfite said:
2. This movie was clearly geared at a much larger demographic and was intended to feel safer for people, overall despite ages. It worked and not only made a MASSIVE amount of money, but was appreciate by people who don't enjoy going to see movies but for entertainment (including me). 3. This series has always had at least one human that tried to do something bad or selfish for stupid reasons, they are just sticking with tradition here. 4. Which kid? And yes, neither of them were particularly good for their roles imo. Agreed here. 5. imbd? Last I checked the box office speaks about whether or not a movie is good. Considering this is a reboot, if you will, and people didn't know what to expect, it went very well. I personally saw this movie twice in theaters and I, honestly, would enjoy seeing it a third time. I've always loved this series but this one opened it up in a big way imo. It was a fantastic movie, overall. |
#5, this wasn't a reboot...this was a straight sequel. They even acknowlege the old park...
Overall I can't even believe you and I saw the same movie...
The actor was sub-par, the story was so full of holes it could have been written at a swiss dairy farm, the characters were flat and the attention to detail was non-existant.
Bet with Adamblaziken:
I bet that on launch the Nintendo Switch will have no built in in-game voice chat. He bets that it will. The winner gets six months of avatar control over the other user.