By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Chrizum said:
Words Of Wisdom said:
Chrizum said:
Ubisoft is a louzy developer on the Wii (they managed to butcher Far Cry, c'mon!), so I don't really care.

According to some, every developer that chooses not to put its game on the Wii is a lousy developer...


Ubisoft released quite a few titles on the Wii, it's not the amount of games that are lacking. But when your developers are able to make Far Cry a bad game (Far Cry Vengeance on the Wii), then something's very wrong. Red Steel wasn't that good too, last Prince of Persia was mediocre on the Wii, Rayman was ok for its type, but its sequel sucked also, and don't get me started on all those Catzzzz and Dogzzzz games.

Ubisoft just can't make a good game for the Wii to save their life. Which is really disappointing, because Ubisoft in general is an excellent developer. They even said they wanted to make "Nintendo-like quality games". Well, Ubisoft: go for it!


Red Steel was also a launch title.  How many 3rd party devs were making those anyway?  I don't think I've played any of Ubisoft's Wii games actually so I can't speak for quality.   All I know is that every time I see a "X developer is not developing for the Wii" there's always some people who will think that's a good thing when in reality fewer games coming to the Wii is anything but a good thing.